-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "RPC retries (second PR) (#3324)" #3642
Conversation
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@jonparrott It's probably easier if we make a branch with the "broken" code already in, and then @calpeyser or someone else can send a PR to fix that branch? |
@jonparrott I'm OK with just the current Why get fancy? |
CircleCI is green, let's merge this puppy? |
cherry-picking places the changes on top of the current master instead of being based on the past (which will be important when we merge the operation future stuff) |
OK, on it. |
Done. After I cherry-picked I |
Don't do it until #3623 is merged |
I shall garden away on the |
Rebase went smoothly 👍 |
@calpeyser @garye @mbrukman FYI #3324 has been reverted and the contents (which need fixing, e.g. because they broken the Bigtable system tests) are in the |
Thanks for the heads up, @dhermes! For our future reference, how does one run all the tests that Circle CI will run after submit? Is it just running |
@mbrukman one needs to run $ . /path/to/configure_my_credentials.sh
$ cd /path/to/google-cloud-python/bigtable
$ nox |
FYI: we're working on a more comprehensive retry story for this library. |
@dhermes — were you planning to address the build issues in the @jonparrott — will that work on a more comprehensive retry story remove the need for this change for Bigtable, or should we still re-submit this change anyway, and that will be a more generic change that we might incorporate into the Bigtable library at some point in the future? |
Sorry for miscommunicating here. I unfortunately do not have cycles for this. |
My hope is that the work will provide the foundation for adding retries to all libraries, at which point we can revisit this change. I'd love to work with you to validate the new functionality and get it into BigTable. |
@jonparrott That's an exciting development. Please keep us looped in! |
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This is due to system test failures
We're happy to reconsider the PR that we reverted, but it must not break the build.