Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

STORAGE: Allowing Batch() constructor to fall back to implicit. #722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2015
Merged

STORAGE: Allowing Batch() constructor to fall back to implicit. #722

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2015

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Mar 12, 2015

NOTE: Has #721 as diffbase.

Also removing last explicit use of the implicit connection in storage regression test.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Mar 12, 2015
@dhermes dhermes added the api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. label Mar 12, 2015
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 2b53706 on dhermes:storage-batch-use-implicit into d9e2156 on GoogleCloudPlatform:master.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Mar 13, 2015

LGTM

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 00e6966 on dhermes:storage-batch-use-implicit into ab642a3 on GoogleCloudPlatform:master.

@dhermes
STORAGE: Allowing Batch() constructor to fall back to implicit.
8007c17 
Also removing last explicit use of the implicit connection in
storage regression test.
dhermes added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2015
@dhermes
Merge pull request #722 from dhermes/storage-batch-use-implicit
8173718 
STORAGE: Allowing Batch() constructor to fall back to implicit.
@dhermes dhermes merged commit 8173718 into googleapis:master Mar 13, 2015
@dhermes dhermes deleted the storage-batch-use-implicit branch March 13, 2015 17:21
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8007c17 on dhermes:storage-batch-use-implicit into 447bba1 on GoogleCloudPlatform:master.

@dhermes dhermes mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2015
Merged
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot
feat: add audience parameter (#291)
41fdeee 
- [ ] Regenerate this pull request now.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 456827138

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@23f1a15

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@4075a85
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNDA3NWE4NTE0ZjY3NjY5MWVjMTU2Njg4YTViYmYxODNhYTk4OTNjZSJ9

feat: Update Compute Engine API to revision 20220526 (#722)
Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@950dd73

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@57ace17
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNTdhY2UxNzhjODU0M2M0NDYyNzgyMzA0NTkxNzgyMGQ2N2I0OTBjMSJ9

fix(deps): require google-api-core 2.8.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@dhermes @coveralls @tseaver @googlebot