Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GCS: Add service_account option #6366

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lxwzy
Copy link
Contributor

@lxwzy lxwzy commented Jun 10, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add service_account option to configure GCS directly using service account key.
This will change the situation which have to use JSON file and GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS env for service account (such as #932 and #6125).

Checklist

  • Documentation added
  • Tests updated
  • Is this an important fix or new feature? Add an entry in the CHANGELOG.md.
  • Changes that require user attention or interaction to upgrade are documented in docs/sources/upgrading/_index.md

@lxwzy lxwzy requested review from KMiller-Grafana and a team as code owners June 10, 2022 17:59
@grafanabot
Copy link
Collaborator

./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki

Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell.

+           ingester	0%
+        distributor	0%
+            querier	0%
+ querier/queryrange	0%
+               iter	0%
+            storage	0%
+           chunkenc	0%
+              logql	0%
+               loki	0%

Copy link
Collaborator

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

Copy link
Contributor

@KMiller-Grafana KMiller-Grafana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Docs for this configuration look good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@kavirajk kavirajk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. thanks @lxwzy

@kavirajk kavirajk merged commit f61cbe4 into grafana:main Jun 13, 2022
@Codecaver
Copy link

LGTM

@osg-grafana osg-grafana added type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories and removed area/docs labels Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants