Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IMP] commission invoices #93

Closed

Conversation

legalsylvain
Copy link
Member

@legalsylvain legalsylvain commented Apr 5, 2024

…n wizard and on the invoice line, depending on the lang of the current user or the supplier partner
@legalsylvain legalsylvain added this to the 12.0 milestone Apr 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.92308% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.32%. Comparing base (6e56221) to head (bc77a9f).
Report is 21 commits behind head on 12.0.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...rds/joint_buying_invoice_commission_wizard_line.py 87.87% 2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             12.0      #93      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.14%   90.32%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         109      111       +2     
  Lines        3276     3379     +103     
  Branches      559      576      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         2953     3052      +99     
- Misses        259      261       +2     
- Partials       64       66       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

…ying.tour model. Add graph and pivot view to display the new values
@legalsylvain legalsylvain force-pushed the 12.0-1137-IMP-supplier-invoicing branch from 49f1c14 to 5a4349d Compare April 5, 2024 12:10
@legalsylvain legalsylvain force-pushed the 12.0-1137-IMP-supplier-invoicing branch from 8969a57 to bc77a9f Compare April 5, 2024 21:44
@legalsylvain
Copy link
Member Author

splited into #104 and #105

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant