Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert more cycles to 'for..of' #2100

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

IvanGoncharov
Copy link
Member

Since #2099 makes it zero-cost to use 'for..of' it's better to improve
code readability and consistency

Since graphql#2099 makes it zero-cost to use 'for..of' it's better to improve
code readability and consistency
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: polish 💅 PR doesn't change public API or any observed behaviour
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant