Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add label for tourism=information + information=office #304

Closed
mrwojo opened this issue Jan 4, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Add label for tourism=information + information=office #304

mrwojo opened this issue Jan 4, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@mrwojo
Copy link
Contributor

mrwojo commented Jan 4, 2014

We don't show the name for tourism=information, instead we show only an "i" symbol. That's probably sufficient for most features with this tag, which are mainly guideposts, boards, or maps.

However, tourism=information can also indicate more significant visitor center buildings that should show the name. When you tag a building with tourism=information, its name disappears, blocked by the "i" symbol. information=office seems to be the common tag to identify these features.

Example where a name should be rendered: Way 112654444 (Kings Canyon National Park Visitor Center in California)

@Rovastar
Copy link
Contributor

Rovastar commented Jan 4, 2014

Adding information tag to the render I cannot see happening. Far to much hassle adding a new tag for a minor feature.
maybe the name could be rendered at zoom level 18 or above.
However for me if I in an area and a building is marked as tourism information that I would expect it to be a building that has tourist information like a visit centre.

@matkoniecz matkoniecz added this to the 3.x - Needs upgrade to mapnik or openstreetmap-carto.style milestone Sep 16, 2014
@matthijsmelissen matthijsmelissen changed the title tourism=information + information=office should show name Add label for tourism=information + information=office Sep 24, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants