Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Travis carto update #2383

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

nebulon42
Copy link
Contributor

update carto version used for Travis and target Mapnik 2.3.0 API version specifically

@yohanboniface
Copy link

Upgrading carto makes sense, but not sure why targetting 2.3.0 specifically?

@nebulon42
Copy link
Contributor Author

Normally I would use whatever is running on the tile servers. Which is 3.0.11? But because of #2374 (comment) I thought the maintainers wanted to keep Mapnik 2 compatibility.

@yohanboniface
Copy link

ah, sure makes sense!

@pnorman
Copy link
Collaborator

pnorman commented Sep 29, 2016

We still have to maintain 2.1 compatibility and older Carto versions too. If we want to test more recent versions we should do it in addition.

@nebulon42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't remember why, could you remind me?

@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

I guess this is #2198.

@nebulon42
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, so it's about Tilemill again. I think this software will haunt us forever. :)

@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

kocio-pl commented Sep 29, 2016

It's rather our policy problem, since git version is already OK, but @gravitystorm doesn't feel it's enough and I don't know if TileMill team would make a release just to satisfy this requirement.

[UPDATE] it's likely.

@pnorman
Copy link
Collaborator

pnorman commented Oct 30, 2016

We still have to maintain 2.1 compatibility and older Carto versions too. If we want to test more recent versions we should do it in addition.

@pnorman pnorman closed this Oct 30, 2016
@nebulon42 nebulon42 deleted the travis branch March 22, 2017 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants