Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix showing Scanner Preferences in EditScanConfigDialog #1420

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2019

Conversation

swaterkamp
Copy link
Member

@swaterkamp swaterkamp commented May 21, 2019

Fix error introduced by 51d80a1

Checklist:

@swaterkamp swaterkamp requested a review from sarahd93 May 21, 2019 07:22
@swaterkamp swaterkamp self-assigned this May 21, 2019
@swaterkamp swaterkamp marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2019 07:27
@swaterkamp swaterkamp requested a review from a team May 21, 2019 07:27
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 21, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1420 into gsa-8.0 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           gsa-8.0    #1420   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    36.97%   36.97%           
========================================
  Files          961      961           
  Lines        21741    21741           
  Branches      6023     6045   +22     
========================================
  Hits          8038     8038           
  Misses       12387    12387           
  Partials      1316     1316
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
gsa/src/web/pages/scanconfigs/editdialog.js 8.77% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1537123...a157f1c. Read the comment docs.

@swaterkamp swaterkamp merged commit 627b80d into greenbone:gsa-8.0 May 21, 2019
@swaterkamp swaterkamp deleted the ScanConfigScannerPrefs branch May 21, 2019 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants