-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugs in choral signs #387
Comments
Can also please test if this issue is still valid? |
That issue does seem to be still valid. My vertical position on the first choral sign isn't quite as low as was displayed in the attached pdf, but it's still on the bottom line of the staff (well below the associate notes). The second choral sign is in the same place as was reported before. |
ok thanx, let's treat them both in the same issue then (this one) |
I think the changes that I made to allow horizontal episemas to go into the stratosphere has fixed the high choral sign gna! issue. The second choral sign is still an issue. |
Good news! |
Looking at the source, I am doubting that high choral signs should actually obey |
@rpspringuel Can you give a few examples of the first point? If you can also explain expected output, that would also help. I really don't think high choral signs should obey |
It's been a long time I haven't been using these, but I think @henryso is right, they're not meant to obey |
I don't have any real world examples of choral signs. I put 2 down as a bug simply based on the naming of the distances. If high choral signs are not meant to obey For the first point, use the following: Main.tex:
test.gabc:
The values for |
It also has something to do with the height of the sign. It appears that if the note is on a line, it's using the
|
I'm not sure what exactly is the right fix, if any, here. This is the code in question:
so |
(deleted - see below) |
ok, also they should be documented better apparently (very simply, like the others) |
I have to admit to being a bit confused now. Clearly the code doesn't do what I would expect given the names. So either the distances need to be renamed, or the code changed (or possibly both), but I'm not sure which. Can anyone point to example chants which have choral signs in them? I know I brought this up on theoretical grounds only, but actual examples of choral signs would help me figure out what's supposed to be going on. |
I don't think there are any chants in liturgical books with choral signs. I think this is an editorial feature. I use it, for example, to add celeriter and tenete symbols to notes. |
@rpspringuel There is definitely something amiss here. The code I pasted above is using |
Never mind. I doubt |
I think the code is doing the right thing, but the dimensions are badly named. I deleted my earlier comment about my suggested renames since I am recapping it here. Here are my findings:
I'm going to put this explanation in the documentation, but I'll be the first to admit that I have no idea why these shifts work. I am also going to reverse the sign of the default value of |
The pull request for this (#439) is ready for review. |
* develop: Added \GreGlyphHeights macro to track the high and low pitches of a glyph. Part of gregorio-project#59. Renamed and documented choral sign dimensions. Fixes gregorio-project#387. Fixed choral signs around porrectus and torculus resupinus. Fixes gregorio-project#387
Playing around with the choral signs I've noticed the following bugs:
beforechoralsignspace
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: