Update deep-source.yml

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Upgraded the .NET version in the GitHub Actions workflow to ensure compatibility with the latest features and improvements.
• This change may improve build performance and access to new .NET capabilities.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	deep-source.yml Update .NET version in deep-source.yml workflow                    .github/workflows/deep-source.yml Updated the .NET version from 7.0.x to 8.0.x. Adjusted the setup configuration for the build process. +1/-1

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the .NET version in the GitHub Actions workflow for improved environment setup.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Deep Source by updating the .NET version from '7.0.x' to '8.0.x'. This change impacts the environment setup for the DeepSource job, which runs on Ubuntu. The job's structure and steps remain unchanged, including code checkout, DeepSource scanner installation, .NET setup, and code analysis, with the same conditional logic for execution based on specific events.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml	Updated .NET version in setup step from '7.0.x' to '8.0.x'

Suggested labels

enhancement, size/XS, ☑️ auto-merge, Review effort [1-5]: 1

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
We hop with joy at the changes today.
.NET's new version, oh what a delight,
Our workflows now shine, so sleek and bright!
With every pull, we build and analyze,
Hopping along, reaching for the skies! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94498bf and dff6098.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/deep-source.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (2)

Line range hint 1-43: Workflow structure and conditional logic look good

The overall structure of the workflow is well-organized and follows GitHub Actions best practices. The conditional logic for the "Build and analyze" step is appropriately complex to handle different scenarios securely, including:

1. Internal pull requests
2. External pull requests (using pull_request_target)
3. Manual workflow dispatches

This setup helps prevent potential security issues with external contributions while still allowing analysis. The use of pull_request_target alongside pull_request is a good security practice for handling external contributions.

---

27-27: Verify compatibility with .NET 8.0.x

The update to .NET 8.0.x is a significant change that may bring performance improvements and new features. However, it's crucial to ensure that your project and its dependencies are compatible with this version.

Please run the following checks:

1. Verify project compatibility:

2. Check for potential breaking changes:

3. Verify dependency compatibility:

If these checks pass, the update is likely safe. Otherwise, you may need to address compatibility issues before merging.

✅ Verification successful

[/run_scripts]

---

.NET 8.0.x Update Verified

The project has been updated to target .NET 8.0.0, and no obsolete or deprecated code usages were found. The existing package references appear compatible with .NET 8.0.x.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the project file specifies a compatible target framework
rg -i 'targetframework.*net8' --type xml

Length of output: 191

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for known breaking changes in .NET 8.0
rg -i 'obsolete|deprecated' --type csharp

Length of output: 43

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any package references specify versions incompatible with .NET 8.0
rg '<PackageReference.*Version' --type xml

Length of output: 193

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all .csproj files and check if TargetFramework or TargetFrameworks includes net8
fd -e csproj | xargs rg -i '<TargetFrameworks?>\s*net8\.\d+'

Length of output: 151

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for obsolete or deprecated usage in C# files
fd -e csproj -e cs -e cshtml | xargs rg -i 'obsolete|deprecated'

Length of output: 66

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package references in .csproj files for compatibility with .NET 8.0
fd -e csproj | xargs rg '<PackageReference.*Version'

Length of output: 1152

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the change is straightforward and involves updating a version number in a configuration file.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: 🚨 Secrets leaked!

Scan results:

🔎 Detected secrets in your GIT history

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Verify compatibility of the workflow with the new .NET version Ensure that the rest of the workflow is compatible with .NET 8, as there may be breaking changes from .NET 7. .github/workflows/deep-source.yml [27] +# Ensure compatibility with .NET 8 in subsequent steps dotnet-version: '8.0.x' Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion highlights an important consideration regarding compatibility, which is relevant after upgrading the .NET version, making it a valuable point.	7
Testing	Test the workflow to confirm successful execution with the new version Consider testing the workflow after the version upgrade to ensure that all steps execute successfully. .github/workflows/deep-source.yml [27] +# Test the workflow after upgrading to .NET 8 dotnet-version: '8.0.x' Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Testing the workflow post-upgrade is a good practice to ensure functionality, although it is more of a procedural recommendation than a direct code improvement.	7
Maintainability	Add a comment to clarify the reason for the version upgrade It may be beneficial to add a comment explaining the rationale behind upgrading the .NET version for future reference. .github/workflows/deep-source.yml [27] +# Upgrading to .NET 8 for improved features and performance dotnet-version: '8.0.x' Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a comment for clarity can improve maintainability, but it is not crucial for the functionality of the workflow.	6
Best practice	Specify a more precise version for better stability Consider specifying a more precise version for the dotnet-version to avoid potential issues with breaking changes in future minor versions. .github/workflows/deep-source.yml [27] -dotnet-version: '8.0.x' +dotnet-version: '8.0.0' Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While specifying a more precise version can enhance stability, the suggestion does not address a critical issue, as using '8.0.x' is still a valid approach for flexibility in minor updates.	5

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (94498bf)	75	1	1.33%
Head commit (dff6098)	75 (+0)	1 (+0)	1.33% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#139)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[AppVeyorBot]

✅ Build PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet 1.1.428 completed (commit 1496f1ad7d by @guibranco)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 1.33%. Comparing base (94498bf) to head (dff6098).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #139   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   1.33%   1.33%           
=====================================
  Files         17      17           
  Lines         75      75           
=====================================
  Hits           1       1           
  Misses        74      74           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.