Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update service-status.php #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Update service-status.php #296

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

@guibranco guibranco commented Nov 14, 2024

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

β„Ή Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new service entry for "GitHub Workflows," now marked as operational.
  • Updates

    • Updated operational status and timestamps for existing services:
      • "API," "Webhook Processing," "Documentation," and "GitHub Integration" timestamps updated.
      • "Dashboard" status changed from "Under Maintenance" to "Operational."

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the service status page by modifying the operational status and timestamps of several services. The services "API", "Webhook Processing", "Documentation", and "GitHub Integration" now reflect a new timestamp of "2024-11-14 19:45 PM UTC". Additionally, the "Dashboard" service status has changed from "Under Maintenance" to "Operational", and a new service, "GitHub Workflows", has been added with an operational status and the same timestamp. The HTML structure remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
Src/service-status.php Updated timestamps for "API", "Webhook Processing", "Documentation", and "GitHub Integration" to "2024-11-14 19:45 PM UTC"; changed "Dashboard" status from "Under Maintenance" to "Operational"; added "GitHub Workflows" as an operational service with the new timestamp.

Suggested labels

enhancement, size/XS

Suggested reviewers

  • gstraccini

🐰 In the meadow, where services thrive,
The status updates, keeping all alive.
From "Under Maintenance" to "Operational" bright,
With timestamps fresh, everything feels right.
New workflows hopping, all set to go,
In the world of code, we put on a show! 🌟

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@github-actions[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d098015 and a10923b.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) November 14, 2024 19:44
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Nov 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs
7:44PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
7:44PM INF 285 commits scanned.
7:44PM INF scan completed in 165ms
7:44PM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco merged commit f5463b9 into main Nov 14, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-2 branch November 14, 2024 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant