Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Still maintained? #65

Closed
Flix6x opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Still maintained? #65

Flix6x opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@Flix6x
Copy link
Contributor

Flix6x commented Mar 14, 2021

I see no more PRs merged since 2018. Is this very nice project still maintained or looking for a new maintainer?

@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Sep 13, 2021

Note isodate will stop working in Python 3.10 due to a DeprecationWarning introduced in Python 3.8 becoming a TypeError in Python 3.10.

Please see #68 or #58 for a fix.

Python 3.10 is due out in just three weeks, so I recommend a release before then.

@gweis If you need a hand with a release, I'd be happy to help out.

@aucampia
Copy link

@gweis would you be open to moving this to @jazzband?

@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Oct 25, 2021

I've put up a temporary fork with a Python 3.10 fix (#68) as isodate2 0.7.0 at https://pypi.org/project/isodate2/

@aucampia
Copy link

thanks for the heads up @hugovk - still think it may be best to move this to @jazzband but I will talk to them and see what they say as they don't really like doing forks, but in this case I'm not sure there are many options.

@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Nov 6, 2021

I've moved my fork to an organisation, it's now at https://github.com/isodate/isodate/.

I've modernised things: dropped EOL Python, added automated release notes and deploys, converted all the tests to pytest, formatted with Black and isort, added pre-commit and linters.

If anyone else is interested in joining the team, please open an issue over there, and also PRs welcome over there!

It's also worth mentioning https://github.com/bolsote/isoduration by @bolsote as doing something similar to isodate. isoduration looks well maintained and switching to isoduration may be a better long term aim rather than continuing with isodate[2].

I'll also check the existing PRs/issues here and see what else can go to https://github.com/isodate/isodate/. Thanks!

@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Nov 6, 2021

And I should mention, I think the aim of the fork should to be conservative in what it accepts, especially given the existence of https://github.com/bolsote/isoduration.

See also bolsote/isoduration#9 (comment) which reviews the open issues here and shows which are already fixed/improved/planned/irrelevant in isoduration or should not be fixed if incompatible with the standard.

@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Jan 29, 2022

The good news is @gweis is back and has made a new release! 🚀

So the fork is no longer needed and I'll archive the repo.

Can this issue be closed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants