-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Format Content-Security-Policy
header directives
#359
Comments
Content-Security-Policy
Thanks for opening this issue @dcog989. |
Hey. Yeah, I'd be happy to do that. I was also wondering if the project would be interested in a significant reformat of the entire document, which I think could be improved for brevity and clarity. E.g.: Existing:
Proposed:
Also, improve consistency of comments and section formatting using syntax from https://github.com/aaron-bond/better-comments (even if a user doesn't employ that extension, the comments would have useful notation?). E.g.: |
Cool, thanks! 👍
Let's stay simple for now, one thing at a time.
Interesting project, but this might be overkill for H5BP boilerplate. Let's stay simple here as well 🙂 |
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy
header directives
OK. Understood. I'll sort out the pull request as specced. :) |
Format Content-Security-Policy header directives h5bp#359
After implementing the included CSP and running it against e.g. https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/ and others, plus a lot of reading, I came up with:
I think that provides a better launch pad for users than the current - both formatting for readability and a more complete list of arguments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: