-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 379
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: contains/containsInAnyOrder overloading issue #317
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Going to try and kick start hamcrest, so if you want to get it merged, please rebase from the branch |
nhojpatrick
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
February 13, 2022 17:06
9bc653b
to
e9f7fc8
Compare
… order to facilitate use in subclasses
Remove Unnecessary Boxing
Explicit type argument T can be replaced with <>
…JavaHamcrest into fix/anyof-allof-cast
Adjusted in #380 as per @nhojpatrick request |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #301.
Caused:
actual
object typeFix:
The assumption is that whenever we get to the
contains(T... items)
with an array, the only possible way to get there with an array is by passingObject
type reference (because ofcontains
overloaded methods). Therefore we can safely add extra-check for embedded array