Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Accessory MP as stack size #2243

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Sep 7, 2024

Conversation

minhperry
Copy link
Contributor

@minhperry minhperry commented Jul 20, 2024

What

https://discord.com/channels/997079228510117908/1263951633059156009

Images

image

image

image

Changelog New Features

  • Added Accessory magical power display as stack size. - minhperry
    • Only works inside the Accessory Bag and Auction House.

Copy link
Owner

@hannibal002 hannibal002 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this pr! the code looks good overall, still needs some polishing.

@hannibal002 hannibal002 added this to the Version 0.26 milestone Jul 21, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 added the Soon This Pull Request will be merged within the next couple of betas label Jul 21, 2024
@minhperry minhperry requested a review from hannibal002 July 21, 2024 15:34
@minhperry minhperry marked this pull request as draft July 22, 2024 22:14
@minhperry
Copy link
Contributor Author

adding support for abicases for now

@minhperry
Copy link
Contributor Author

for some reasons the "Auctions: *" regex would just never pass despite passing IJ tester

image

@minhperry minhperry marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2024 11:34
@minhperry
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

Is this intended it just spams my email with this

Copy link
Contributor

@Thunderblade73 Thunderblade73 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I late to this. But what the isAccessory function does should already be done by the itemCategory code. If it isn't for some wierd reason / edge case, please let me know and I will fix it.

Copy link
Contributor

@Thunderblade73 Thunderblade73 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code structure is good. But you missed some stuff that is mostly unqiue to our repo (eg: pattern for mostly everything). I also added some formatting stuff that makes the code look better.

@hannibal002 hannibal002 removed the Soon This Pull Request will be merged within the next couple of betas label Jul 31, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 added the Soon This Pull Request will be merged within the next couple of betas label Aug 21, 2024
@minhperry minhperry requested a review from hannibal002 August 24, 2024 02:48
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Merge Conflicts There are open merge conflicts with the beta branch. label Aug 26, 2024
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch "beta". Please resolve those so we can test out your changes.

Copy link

Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Merge Conflicts There are open merge conflicts with the beta branch. label Aug 26, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 merged commit 4663ebc into hannibal002:beta Sep 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Soon This Pull Request will be merged within the next couple of betas label Sep 7, 2024
MTOnline69 pushed a commit to MTOnline69/SkyHanni that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Co-authored-by: hannibal2 <24389977+hannibal00212@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants