Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement ValidationCheck for the check #2242

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024
Merged

Implement ValidationCheck for the check #2242

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

hannobraun
Copy link
Owner

From the message of the main commit:

The way it was previously, fully qualified method call syntax would have
been required to run a validation check. This wasn't visible in the code
so far, as there only is one validation check currently.

This change makes running validation checks a bit more convenient
(compared to what it would have needed to be, not what's currently in
the code). It preserves the discoverability, as the implementations are
still listed in the documentation of the object type.

This is a further refinement of the infrastructure added for #2157.

The way it was previously, fully qualified method call syntax would have
been required to run a validation check. This wasn't visible in the code
so far, as there only is one validation check currently.

This change makes running validation checks a bit more convenient
(compared to what it would have needed to be, not what's currently in
the code). It preserves the discoverability, as the implementations are
still listed in the documentation of the object type.
@hannobraun hannobraun enabled auto-merge February 28, 2024 09:26
@hannobraun hannobraun merged commit 49306ad into main Feb 28, 2024
4 checks passed
@hannobraun hannobraun deleted the validation branch February 28, 2024 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant