Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow config-file based Service Definitions for unmanaged proxies #4443

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2018

Conversation

banks
Copy link
Member

@banks banks commented Jul 25, 2018

Fixes #4417

We forgot to add plumbing to config to allow these Service Definitions to exist in config files as well as API calls.

Updated docs to be comprehensive again although in general we already documented these fields as working!

@banks banks changed the title Allow config-file based Service Definitions for unmanaged proxies Fixes #4442. Allow config-file based Service Definitions for unmanaged proxies Jul 25, 2018
@banks banks changed the title Fixes #4442. Allow config-file based Service Definitions for unmanaged proxies Allow config-file based Service Definitions for unmanaged proxies Jul 25, 2018
@banks banks requested review from pearkes and mkeeler July 25, 2018 16:00
Copy link
Contributor

@mitchellh mitchellh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me.

@@ -357,7 +359,9 @@ type CheckDefinition struct {

// ServiceConnect is the connect block within a service registration
type ServiceConnect struct {
// TODO(banks) add way to specify that the app is connect-native
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haha.

@pearkes pearkes added this to the 1.2.2 milestone Jul 25, 2018
@banks banks merged commit 5635227 into master Jul 25, 2018
@banks banks deleted the unmanaged-proxy-config branch July 25, 2018 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants