changelog: add changelog update for vendor label for linux packaging #16071
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jrasell
requested changes
Feb 9, 2023
|
@jrasell that's correct, I've updated the PR to reflect your feedback and I ended up changing the changelog # to reflect the #PR number here instead of the PR number in the linux-packaging action. Feel free to merge this whenever you're ready. |
lgfa29
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2023
jrasell
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2023
lgfa29
added
backport/1.3.x
tgross
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is just an update to the changelog to reflect a bug that was fixed in our actions-packaging-linux action. We received a report from a user stating that vendor labels were missing when downloading linux packages (for products that were released via CRT) We fixed this in this PR and we added a vendor label and set the default to
HashiCorpThis will only affect future releases that go through our linux promotion pipeline -- historical releases will not have this vendor label.