Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP #20778

Closed
gazoakley opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #21960
Closed

Feature Request: Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP #20778

gazoakley opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #21960
Labels
new-resource Introduces a new resource. service/fsx Issues and PRs that pertain to the fsx service.
Milestone

Comments

@gazoakley
Copy link
Contributor

gazoakley commented Sep 2, 2021

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

New or Affected Resource(s)

  • aws_fsx_ontap_file_system
  • aws_fsx_storage_virtual_machine
  • aws_fsx_volume

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "aws_fsx_ontap_file_system" "example" {
  kms_key_id         = aws_kms_key.example.arn
  storage_capacity   = 300
  security_group_ids = [aws_security_group.example.id]
  subnet_ids         = [aws_subnet.example.id]

  automatic_backup_retention_days   = number
  daily_automatic_backup_start_time = "string"
  deployment_type                   = "string"
  disk_iops_configuration = {
    iops = 123
    mode = "string"
  }
  endpoint_ip_address_range     = "string"
  fsx_admin_password            = "string"
  preferred_subnet_id           = "string"
  route_table_ids               = ["string"]
  throughput_capacity           = 123
  weekly_maintenance_start_time = "string"
}

resource "aws_fsx_storage_virtual_machine" "example" {
  file_system_id             = aws_fsx_ontap_file_system.example.id
  name                       = "string"
  root_volume_security_style = "string"
  svm_admin_password         = "string"

  active_directory_configuration = {
    net_bios_name = "string"
    self_managed_active_directory_configuration = {
      dns_ips                                = ["string"]
      domain_name                            = "string"
      file_system_administrators_froup       = "string"
      organizational_unit_distinguished_name = "string"
      password                               = "string"
      username                               = "string"
    }
  }

  tags = {
    key = "value"
  }
}

resource "aws_fsx_volume" "example" {
  name                       = "example"
  junction_path              = "/"
  security_style             = "NTFS"
  size_in_megabytes          = 1024
  storage_efficiency_enabled = true
  storage_virtual_machine_id = aws_fsx_storage_virtual_machine.example.id
  volume_type                = "ONTAP"

  tiering_policy = {
    cooling_period = 31
    name           = "AUTO"
  }

  tags = {
    key = "value"
  }
}

References

@gazoakley gazoakley added the enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. label Sep 2, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. service/fsx Issues and PRs that pertain to the fsx service. labels Sep 2, 2021
@gazoakley
Copy link
Contributor Author

gazoakley commented Sep 2, 2021

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 added new-resource Introduces a new resource. and removed enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Sep 3, 2021
aliscott added a commit to infracost/infracost that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2021
AWS have added support for NetAPP ONTAP to FSx which means multiple products were returned for our filters.
This filesystem isn't supported yet by Terraform (see hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#20778)
alikhajeh1 pushed a commit to infracost/infracost that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2021
AWS have added support for NetAPP ONTAP to FSx which means multiple products were returned for our filters.
This filesystem isn't supported yet by Terraform (see hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#20778)
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 self-assigned this Sep 14, 2021
@DrFaust92
Copy link
Collaborator

DrFaust92 commented Sep 18, 2021

@philippecotter
Copy link

Hi to all. I'm very interested for this request. We actually use the resource for file server creation and we are very
impatient to be able to create svm and volumes via our TFE infrastructure.

Thanks to all for your work !

Philippe Cotter
Cloud Hosting Engineer @richemont - Switzerland

@github-actions
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v3.70.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 removed their assignment Mar 26, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2022

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
new-resource Introduces a new resource. service/fsx Issues and PRs that pertain to the fsx service.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants