Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r/aws_autoscaling_schedule: Allow empty value #1268

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2017

Conversation

grubernaut
Copy link
Contributor

@grubernaut grubernaut commented Jul 27, 2017

Initially opened in hashicorp/terraform#9941
Migrated to the new provider repository

$ make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS="-run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne (182.68s)
PASS
ok      github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws       182.688s

Initial work done by @glasser

@grubernaut grubernaut added the bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. label Jul 27, 2017
@grubernaut grubernaut requested a review from catsby July 27, 2017 20:08
Initially opened in github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/9941
Migrated to the new provider repository

```
$ make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS="-run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_negativeOne (182.68s)
PASS
ok      github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws       182.688s
```
@grubernaut grubernaut merged commit 90d5b88 into master Jul 28, 2017
@grubernaut grubernaut deleted the b-empty-value-asg-params-9941 branch July 28, 2017 13:36
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 11, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Addresses a defect in current functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants