-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New resource aws_db_proxy #12704
New resource aws_db_proxy #12704
Conversation
@gazoakley FYI, postgres support in RDS proxy just landed: https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2020/04/amazon-rds-proxy-with-postgresql-compatibility-preview/ |
…ecrets created by tests
Im waiting this resource but there is no action in 50 days. |
when this PR will be merged !? we want it ! |
What will it take to get this PR approved and merged?? My team and I are blocked because we need the functionality this almost 6 month old PR would provide. |
Bump, please 🙏 ! |
Bump, please ❤️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Getting pretty close -- just noting the remaining pending review items. I think we would like to get this released next week on Thursday, so please reach out if you need anything or do not have time to finish this up.
@bflad Since merging in master/main and applying the review changes I've not been able to run the tests. I think I'm going mad!:
Yet if I build the provider and try and use it I get a successful apply. Is there anything obvious I've screwed up? :-) |
Co-authored-by: Brian Flad <bflad417@gmail.com>
Do you have Terraform 0.12.26 or later installed locally by chance? I think the newer test driver that uses real Terraform binaries may act a little strange on versions earlier than that. If you are on an okay version then I can certainly ask around. |
Ah - I was still on 0.12.24. Just upgraded to 0.13.1 and now seems to work fine - d'oh! 🍩 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much for all your hard work here, @gazoakley, looks good to me 🚀
Output from acceptance testing:
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_disappears (744.42s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_AuthDescription (755.17s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_Tags (763.39s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_basic (764.74s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_AuthSecretArn (765.79s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_VpcSecurityGroupIds (819.88s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_DebugLogging (824.05s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_RequireTls (826.22s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_RoleArn (833.73s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_IdleClientTimeout (838.79s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_Name (862.25s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBProxy_AuthIamAuth (895.23s)
This has been released in version 3.5.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks! |
Hi , the documenation says terraform only supports this resource for MYSQL . When will the support for POSTGRESQL be added ? engine_family - (Required, Forces new resource) The kinds of databases that the proxy can connect to. This value determines which database network protocol the proxy recognizes when it interprets network traffic to and from the database. Currently, this value is always MYSQL. The engine family applies to both RDS MySQL and Aurora MySQL. |
Hi @swagsb - the good news is the resource should already support PostgreSQL (specify it as |
so is there a resource available like - aws_db_proxy_default_target_group ? . I mean how to add targets to the proxy ? Is that is what you said is in progress Is it this - #12743 ? |
Hi @swagsb
There are two in progress PRs:
|
aws_db_proxy_target : Thanks for the reply . I guess I am looking for #12784 - aws_db_proxy_target. Any idea when it will be live ? |
Can I use the aws_db_proxy without have the aws_db_proxy_target? |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Community Note
Relates #12690
Release note for CHANGELOG:
Output from acceptance testing: