Support updates for aws_ssm_association & aws_ssm_patch_baseline resources

[stack72]

Fixes: #1296

aws_ssm_association:

• parameters
• schedule_expression
• output_location

% make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_basic (128.55s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withTargets
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withTargets (34.77s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withParameters
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withParameters (57.27s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withDocumentVersion
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withDocumentVersion (43.08s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withOutputLocation
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withOutputLocation (153.91s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withScheduleExpression
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMAssociation_withScheduleExpression (59.03s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	476.632s

aws_ssm_patch_baseline

• name
• description
• global_filter
• approval_rule
• approved_patches
• rejected_patches
• approved_patches_compliance_level

% make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSSMPatchBaseline'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSSMPatchBaseline -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMPatchBaseline_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMPatchBaseline_basic (42.98s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSSSMPatchBaselineWithOperatingSystem
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSSMPatchBaselineWithOperatingSystem (44.24s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	87.247s

[catsby]

Thanks @stack72 ! I confirmed with some tests locally, this looks great.

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!