-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Resource: aws_s3_bucket_replication #972
Conversation
bc889ef
to
58e493c
Compare
7924908
to
7882020
Compare
7882020
to
c737957
Compare
484f56b
to
eea0984
Compare
@radeksimko @bflad @mpilar would love a review 🙇
|
Fixes #749 |
Hi, any chance of this getting merged anytime soon? Could really use crr as a separate resource. |
yeah damn near forgot about this... |
Will it be merge ? I was trying to create bidirectionnal s3 replication and I had to fake the 'arn' toavoid 'cycle error'. |
Hi folks, |
@elbuo8 Could you please rebase your branch, so the PR hopefully could be merged? 🙏 |
@elbuo8 Could you please rebase your branch, so we get this new resource? I am desperately in need of this. |
@elbuo8 Are you still tracking this? |
@elbuo8: I am still tracking this and in desperate need of this. I am right now attempting this with a mix of terraform and aws cli but getting an official fix would really help. |
waiting on this PR to be merged |
Any update on this PR? |
@radeksimko could this be adopted by an in-house dev? this is a super useful resource that never hit |
bump |
Hi folks 👋 Just to quickly provide some context here about this lingering pull request -- this will likely be further looked into after Terraform AWS Provider version 3.0.0 is released (in a few weeks). Since this will impact a large portion of the community, we will write up a proposal issue for splitting out all the various S3 Bucket functionality into separate resources and come up with an action plan. The hope would be that the new resources would be introduced early in the 3.x versions and the inline S3 Bucket functionality removed in 4.0.0. |
Notification of Recent and Upcoming Changes to ContributionsThank you for this contribution! There have been a few recent development changes that affect this pull request. We apologize for the inconvenience, especially if there have been long review delays up until now. Please note that this is automated message from an unmonitored account. See the FAQ for additional information on the maintainer team and review prioritization. If you are unable to complete these updates, please leave a comment for the community and maintainers so someone can potentially continue the work. The maintainers will encourage other contributors to use the existing contribution as the base for additional changes as appropriate. Otherwise, contributions that do not receive updated code or comments from the original contributor may be closed in the future so the maintainers can focus on active items. For the most up to date information about Terraform AWS Provider development, see the Contributing Guide. Additional technical debt changes can be tracked with the As part of updating a pull request with these changes, the most current unit testing and linting will run. These may report issues that were not previously reported. Action Required: Terraform 0.12 SyntaxReference: #8950 Version 3 and later of the Terraform AWS Provider, which all existing contributions would potentially be added, only supports Terraform 0.12 and later. Certain syntax elements of Terraform 0.11 and earlier show deprecation warnings during runs with Terraform 0.12. Documentation and test configurations, such as those including deprecated string interpolations ( Action Required: Terraform Plugin SDK Version 2Reference: #14551 The Terraform AWS Provider has been upgraded to the latest version of the Terraform Plugin SDK. Generally, most changes to contributions should only involve updating Go import paths in source code files. Please see the referenced issue for additional information. Removal of website/aws.erb FileReference: #14712 Any changes to the Upcoming Change of Git Branch NamingReference: #14292 Development environments will need their upstream Git branch updated from Upcoming Change of GitHub OrganizationReference: #14715 This repository will be migrating from https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws to https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws. No practitioner or developer action is anticipated and most GitHub functionality will automatically redirect to the new location. Go import paths including |
@bflad : I see that this is scheduled for review -- I am more than happy to own any required changes if you need a hand, assuming the original contributor lost all hope long ago. :-O |
Any progress on this? I need both of my buckets with replication after they are created, replication between us-east-1 and us-west-2.. right now we are using local-exec after both buckets are created using |
Someone just needs to create a new PR at this point. Please don't wait for permission. If you have time, do it. |
Pull request #21306 has significantly refactored the AWS Provider codebase. As a result, most PRs opened prior to the refactor now have merge conflicts that must be resolved before proceeding. Specifically, PR #21306 relocated the code for all AWS resources and data sources from a single We recognize that many pull requests have been open for some time without yet being addressed by our maintainers. Therefore, we want to make it clear that resolving these conflicts in no way affects the prioritization of a particular pull request. Once a pull request has been prioritized for review, the necessary changes will be made by a maintainer -- either directly or in collaboration with the pull request author. For a more complete description of this refactor, including examples of how old filepaths and function names correspond to their new counterparts: please refer to issue #20000. For a quick guide on how to amend your pull request to resolve the merge conflicts resulting from this refactor and bring it in line with our new code patterns: please refer to our Service Package Refactor Pull Request Guide. |
Superseded by #20777. |
@elbuo8 Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏. |
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. |
Reason: If trying to create two-way cross replication buckets, you come into a dependency cycle. This additionally allows replication to be a conditional.