-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Resource: azurerm_application_load_balancer_frontend
#23411
Conversation
azurerm_application_load_balancer_frontend
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey @ziyeqf
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline, but I'm unsure why we've reverted the naming back to as in the previous PR, so can we fix this?
Thanks!
...services/servicenetworking/service_networking_application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...services/servicenetworking/service_networking_application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
website/docs/r/service_networking_application_load_balancer.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
website/docs/r/service_networking_application_load_balancer_frontend.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...services/servicenetworking/service_networking_application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/service_networking_application_load_balancer_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nal/services/servicenetworking/service_networking_application_load_balancer_resource_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: ziyeqf <51212351+ziyeqf@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: ziyeqf <51212351+ziyeqf@users.noreply.github.com>
82d0ba4
to
1f46606
Compare
Signed-off-by: ziyeqf <51212351+ziyeqf@users.noreply.github.com>
new test
|
Signed-off-by: ziyeqf <51212351+ziyeqf@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @ziyeqf - thanks for fixing this up, I left two minor comments but overall this is looking good! Thanks!
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…frontend_resource.go Co-authored-by: catriona-m <86247157+catriona-m@users.noreply.github.com>
…frontend_resource.go Co-authored-by: catriona-m <86247157+catriona-m@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM aside from a couple comments ⛈️
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/servicenetworking/application_load_balancer_frontend_resource_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM aside from a couple comments ⛈️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM aside from a couple comments ⛈️
…frontend_resource.go
…frontend_resource.go
…frontend_resource.go
…frontend_resource.go
…frontend_resource_test.go
…frontend_resource_test.go
<Actions> <action id="4a39167e811ac038e4a588362092472c27cfbe9e4929ae61d035f708a093a669"> <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3> <details id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24"> <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary> <p>"hashicorp/azurerm" updated from "3.76.0" to "3.77.0" in file ".terraform.lock.hcl"</p> <details> <summary>3.77.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.77.0
FEATURES:

* New Resources: `azurerm_application_load_balancer_frontend` ([#23411](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23411 New Resources: `azurerm_dev_center` ([#23538](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23538 New Resources: `azurerm_dev_center_project` ([#23538](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23538))

ENHANCEMENTS:

* dependencies: updating to `v0.62.0` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers` ([#23581](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23581 dependencies: updating Kusto SDK from `2023-05-02` to `2023-08-15` ([#23598](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23598 dependencies: updating nginx from `2022-08-01` to `2023-04-01` ([#23583](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23583 `netapp`: updating to use API Version `2023-05-01` ([#23576](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23576 `springcloud`: updating to use API Version `2023-09-01-preview` ([#23544](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23544 `storage`: updating to use API Version `2023-01-01` ([#23543](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23543 `internal/sdk`: fixing an issue where struct fields containing `removedInNextMajorVersion` wouldn't be decoded correctly ([#23564](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23564 `internal/sdk`: struct tag parsing is now handled consistently during both encoding and decoding ([#23568](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23568 provider: the `roll_instances_when_required` provider feature in the `virtual_machine_scale_set` block is now optional ([#22976](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#22976 Data Source: `azurerm_automation_account`: refactoring the remaining usage of `Azure/azure-sdk-for-go` to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#23555](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23555 `azurerm_automation_account`: refactoring the remaining usage of `Azure/azure-sdk-for-go` to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#23555](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23555 `azurerm_resource_deployment_script_azure_cli` - improve validation for the `version` property to support newer versions ([#23370](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23370 `azurerm_resource_deployment_script_azure_power_shell` - improve validation for the `version` property to support newer versions ([#23370](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23370 `azurerm_nginx_deployment` - support for the `capacity` and `email` properties ([#23596](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23596))

BUG FIXES:

* Data Source: `azurerm_virtual_hub_connection` - export the `inbound_route_map_id`, `outbound_route_map_id`, and `static_vnet_local_route_override_criteria` attributes in the `routing` block, and fix a bug where these attributes could not be set ([#23491](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23491 `azurerm_cdn_frontdoor_rule` - the `url_filename_condition` properties `match_values` is now optional if `operator` is set to `Any` ([#23541](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23541 `azurerm_shared_image_gallery` - added the `Private` and `Groups` options for the `sharing.permission` property ([#23570](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23570 `azurerm_redis_cache` - fixed incorrect ssl values for `redis_primary_connection_string` and `secondary_connection_string` ([#23575](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23575 `azurerm_monitor_activity_log_alert` - the `recommend_category` property now can be set to `HighAvailability` ([#23605](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23605 `azurerm_recovery_services_vault` - the `encryption` property can now be used with the `cross_region_restore_enabled` property ([#23618](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23618 `azurerm_storage_account_customer_managed_key` - prevent a panic when the keyvault id is empty ([#23599](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23599))


</pre> </details> </details> </action> </Actions> --- <table> <tr> <td width="77"> <img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli logo" width="50" height="50"> </td> <td> <p> Created automatically by <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a> </p> <details><summary>Options:</summary> <br /> <p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its manifest(s)</a>.</p> <ul> <li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen it, the next time it runs.</li> <li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li> </ul> <p> Feel free to report any issues at <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br /> If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on our <a href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>! </p> </details> </td> </tr> </table> Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
azurerm_application_load_balancer
is also affected, and also tested.test