Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing heroku read for organization app #668

Closed

Conversation

kubek2k
Copy link
Contributor

@kubek2k kubek2k commented Dec 14, 2014

it will help in managing state when transitioning from org app to private and back.

@kubek2k kubek2k force-pushed the fixing_heroku_organization_app_read branch 4 times, most recently from 7da3076 to bf410c0 Compare December 16, 2014 21:10
@kubek2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

kubek2k commented Dec 16, 2014

I removed some unnecessary logic + added mandatory fields to be set about organization (locked, # and private)

@kubek2k kubek2k force-pushed the fixing_heroku_organization_app_read branch from bf410c0 to 9b022b7 Compare December 16, 2014 21:26
@kubek2k kubek2k force-pushed the fixing_heroku_organization_app_read branch from 9b022b7 to 2aa3110 Compare December 16, 2014 21:27
@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Jan 30, 2015

Hi there - thanks for this!

Can you lay out for me some steps to take to smoke test this? Then I can verify it and pull it in if all looks good. 👍

@phinze phinze self-assigned this Jan 30, 2015
@phinze phinze added the waiting-response An issue/pull request is waiting for a response from the community label Jan 30, 2015
d.Set("git_url", app.App.GitURL)
d.Set("web_url", app.App.WebURL)
d.Set("config_vars", configVarsValue)
d.Set("all_config_vars", app.Vars)
if organizationApp {
d.Set("organization.#", "1")
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line could be dropped with recent fix for the map (count no longer stored)

@kubek2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

kubek2k commented Feb 7, 2015

the situation might occur eg:

  • you have an existing private application in heroku with a name x
  • you instruct terraform to create an organization application under the same name x
    terraform will conclude that the application already exists even though its in totally different namespace.

@phinze phinze removed the waiting-response An issue/pull request is waiting for a response from the community label Feb 21, 2015
@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Feb 21, 2015

Working with Heroku Support to set up an organization for Terraform acceptance testing. Will follow up when I've heard back from them.

@phinze phinze assigned catsby and unassigned phinze Feb 26, 2015
@josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor

@phinze you heard back from heroku? anything we can do to move this forward?

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Oct 5, 2015

I had a long and meandering support ticket that resulted in a test organization being allocated, but now logging into my account today it's gone again. 😞

Re-upped with a fresh support ticket and we'll see what happens.

If anybody from the community w/ an account can test this and report 👍 I'm happy to pull it in on your word. Otherwise I'll check back in when I get a fresh org acct.

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Jan 4, 2016

Re-submitted this as #4495 - finally landing it! 😅

@phinze phinze closed this Jan 4, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 29, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 29, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants