Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update npm package graphql to v16.10.0 #5919

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Dec 15, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
graphql dependencies minor 16.9.0 -> 16.10.0
graphql devDependencies minor 16.9.0 -> 16.10.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

graphql/graphql-js (graphql)

v16.10.0: 16.10.0

Compare Source

v16.10.0 (2024-12-15)
New Feature 🚀
Bug Fix 🐞
Docs 📝
10 PRs were merged
Internal 🏠
4 PRs were merged
Committers: 5

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge December 15, 2024 21:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps > hash-api Affects the HASH API (app) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests area/tests > integration New or updated integration tests area/tests > playwright New or updated Playwright tests area/apps labels Dec 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.86%. Comparing base (a0e38fe) to head (2efbb52).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5919      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.90%   22.86%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         572      573       +1     
  Lines       19394    19445      +51     
  Branches     2746     2754       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         4442     4447       +5     
- Misses      14899    14945      +46     
  Partials       53       53              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 1.16% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit c6d0d1c Dec 15, 2024
165 of 166 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/js/graphql-npm-packages branch December 15, 2024 22:20
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.686 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$59.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.858 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$55.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$96.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 404 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$88.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$92.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.41 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.39 \mathrm{s} \pm 540 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$84.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 422 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.95 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.38 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.776 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.08 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.82 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.72 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps > hash-api Affects the HASH API (app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) area/tests > integration New or updated integration tests area/tests > playwright New or updated Playwright tests area/tests New or updated tests type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant