Update Rust crate proptest to v1.6.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
proptest (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	=1.5.0 -> =1.6.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.72%. Comparing base (c6d0d1c) to head (a6a93dc).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5935      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.86%   21.72%   -1.15%     
==========================================
  Files         573      566       -7     
  Lines       19445    19157     -288     
  Branches     2754     2752       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         4447     4162     -285     
+ Misses      14945    14943       -2     
+ Partials       53       52       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.17% <ø> (-8.05%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.777 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$78.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 599 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$86.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$90.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 459 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.41 \mathrm{s} \pm 545 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.540 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$83.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 404 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-54.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.05 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.19 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.49 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.35 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph