Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove --allow-{newer,older} support from Cabal #4527

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 19, 2017
Merged

Conversation

hvr
Copy link
Member

@hvr hvr commented May 19, 2017

This is a preparatory refactoring needed for future work such as #4203.

I've refrained from doing additional cleanups in order to keep this a
refactoring that mostly moves around blocks of code mostly
unchanged (except for whitespace), and make it easier to review.

This feature was originally implemented because its lack was complained
about by Stack/Stackage developers. However, after it got implemented it
was never really being used; what's more, it's causing us overhead for
no benefit as well as blocking us improving the implementation via the
likes of #4203.

Closes #3581

This is a preparatory refactoring needed for future work such as haskell#4203.

I've refrained from doing additional cleanups in order to keep this a
refactoring that mostly moves around blocks of code mostly
unchanged (except for whitespace), and make it easier to review.

This feature was originally implemented because its lack was complained
about by Stack/Stackage developers. However, after it got implemented it
was never really being used; what's more, it's causing us overhead for
no benefit as well as blocking us improving the implementation via the
likes of haskell#4203.

Closes haskell#3581
@mention-bot
Copy link

@hvr, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @dcoutts, @pepeiborra and @ezyang to be potential reviewers.

@hvr
Copy link
Member Author

hvr commented May 19, 2017

@23Skidoo Travis is green! Do you want to review this PR or can I merge it rightaway?

Copy link
Member

@23Skidoo 23Skidoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Feel free to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants