Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: track progress if the terminal width allows it #768

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jooola
Copy link
Member

@jooola jooola commented May 31, 2024

  • Reduce the width of the actions messages (remove 'to complete')
  • Only print progress when the terminal width is bigger than 80.
  • Reduce the padding when printing the actions messages

Fixes #767

@jooola jooola requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 10:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 31, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 11.11111% with 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.38%. Comparing base (4ee0db1) to head (b2748ac).

Files Patch % Lines
internal/ui/helpers.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
internal/ui/progress.go 0.00% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
internal/ui/progress_terminal.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #768      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.43%   60.38%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         190      190              
  Lines        6776     6781       +5     
==========================================
  Hits         4095     4095              
- Misses       2067     2072       +5     
  Partials      614      614              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@phm07
Copy link
Contributor

phm07 commented Jun 5, 2024

The bug still happens if you start with a terminal width > 80 and then resize the window down during the action

@jooola
Copy link
Member Author

jooola commented Jun 5, 2024

The bug still happens if you start with a terminal width > 80 and then resize the window down during the action

I am happy not to cover this edge case. The alternative being to change the progress library or change our progress tracker altogether.

@apricote What do you think?

Copy link
Member

@apricote apricote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy to accept that edge case for now!

@jooola jooola merged commit 069fffe into main Jun 5, 2024
5 checks passed
@jooola jooola deleted the fix-progress-bar branch June 5, 2024 11:45
phm07 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.44.0](v1.43.1...v1.44.0)
(2024-06-20)


### Features

* delete multiple resources in parallel
([#761](#761))
([f2fb321](f2fb321))
* improve toml formatting
([#758](#758))
([eacb7dd](eacb7dd))
* **load-balancer:** allow specifying health check options in
add-service ([#743](#743))
([2cd08b2](2cd08b2)),
closes [#742](#742)
* new action waiting progress
([#749](#749))
([9e30f3f](9e30f3f))
* new configuration system, config subcommand
([#736](#736))
([d1c6678](d1c6678))
* **server-type:** add deprecated column to list command
([#780](#780))
([906f864](906f864))
* **server:** add default-ssh-keys option
([#759](#759))
([9b34d26](9b34d26))


### Bug Fixes

* **firewall:** 'create --rules-file' not working with outbound rules
([#752](#752))
([2f2be32](2f2be32)),
closes [#750](#750)
* network list server count format
([#783](#783))
([f69d261](f69d261))
* track progress if the terminal width allows it
([#768](#768))
([069fffe](069fffe)),
closes [#767](#767)

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Progress animation is rendered on a new line when the terminal is too small
3 participants