When updating a project, only list programs from the project's organization (Fixes #394) #439
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Get updates from Main repo
Updates Contribution md file (#434)
…lable Current Behavior: All the programs in the system are available when editing a project Expected Behavior: Only programs belonging to an organization should be available when editing a projects
andrewtpham
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2020
Kimaiyo077
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the Purpose?
Current Behavior: All the programs in the system are available when editing a project
Expected Behavior: Only programs belonging to an organization should be available when editing a project.
What was the approach?
Using the project's instance, get the project's program, then the organization and return all programs in that organization.
Are there any concerns to addressed further before or after merging this PR?
N/A
Mentions?
@andrewtpham @ninetteadhikari @nasirhjafri
Issue(s) affected?
#394