Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added the IE plugin source. Time to get cooking! #16

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dovy
Copy link

@dovy dovy commented Sep 4, 2013

This is the IE plugin that we used. Based in Visual Studio 2008. The goal is to make this work without Visual Studio, obviously. If not, we'll have to have a build service for people.

Has some work to do. Good luck!

@honestbleeps
Copy link
Owner

i do still plan to look at this soon, I've just been swamped. I just wanted to post an update in case any interested parties are watching this as it's really exciting if we can get it working!

@dovy
Copy link
Author

dovy commented Sep 1, 2014

Is this dead then?

@honestbleeps
Copy link
Owner

hey Dovy, i'm really sorry for the lack of action, things outside of work have made it hard to work on BabelExt but I'm sincerely interested in reviving it... I haven't had the chance to get a VM going and my windows machine is hosed...

Do you have some time in the near future to perhaps get on a google hangout and walk me through testing / working with the IE portion of things? If we schedule something, that forces me to set aside the time, and I could use a refresher on how to deal w/the IE side of things because I don't quite know where to start and that's going to be a barrier to entry...

@dovy
Copy link
Author

dovy commented Sep 1, 2014

I actually found this...
https://github.com/trigger-corp/browser-extensions

It's called Open Forge and it already has IE. Perhaps we could marry the two?

@honestbleeps
Copy link
Owner

a few of us from the RES team actually discussed that one a while ago, a few concerns:

I'm certainly open to borrowing concepts and whatnot from the project, but it seems they've lost interest in it. I, on the other hand, haven't lost interest so much as available time :-(

That said, I'd like to schedule some time to get BabelExt in better shape, and if we could schedule some collab time I'm up for it. CC: @andytuba in case he is interested too.

@dovy
Copy link
Author

dovy commented Sep 1, 2014

  • Heh, same?
  • True, but man it's functioning.
  • Only because they've moved to another system and left it to the community.

Yes, triggerIO the company could care less. But why not fork it and use it. I mean, you don't need another environment to build. They have that all built into one package and that's nice.

I'm fine for a chat sometime. I just am hoping to have something this year. :P

@honestbleeps
Copy link
Owner

I haven't tried trigger's package at all so I have no idea how functional
it is, etc... have you toyed with it at all?

If you have -- what makes you still want to tinker with BabelExt at all if
they've got something good/working? Should I just abandon BE?

I'm not thrilled with their startup requirements, but how much point is
there in my reinventing the wheel if you've played with what they have and
are happy with it?

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Dovy Paukstys notifications@github.com
wrote:

  • Heh, same?
  • True, but man it's functioning.
  • Only because they've moved to another system and left it to the
    community.

Yes, triggerIO the company could care less. But why not fork it and use
it. I mean, you don't need another environment to build. They have that all
built into one package and that's nice.

I'm fine for a chat sometime. I just am hoping to have something this
year. :P


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment).

@dovy
Copy link
Author

dovy commented Sep 1, 2014

I just dug in. Creation was painless. They use a python environment so you can build with any OS I believe (docs haven't said otherwise). Haven't really dug in, but I don't think they have as many APIs as you do. That's why I suggested a marry. ;)

@Ithamar
Copy link

Ithamar commented May 15, 2015

Just a warning, I've had a project use OpenForge, and even after upgrading the FF SDK version in there, it got bounced by the FF add-on review crew, so if you go and use that, you'll most likely not get it into the FF extension store.
Also, for the average browser extension, I think it is overly complicated and hard to maintain, I really like the relatively "minimalist" approach of BabelExt ;)
Edit: Also, IE support seems to be broken in OpenForce for anything more recent then IE9 IIRC. I might be able to find some time and allocate it to look into this IE patch, since it is high on our wishlist too..

@Ithamar
Copy link

Ithamar commented May 18, 2015

@dovy, if it is just about the creation process, going with a yeoman generator for this project would be much easier, flexible, and easy to maintain (more people understanding yeoman generators then the custom hacked Python build system of OpenForge).
EDIT: hmmm, thinking about that, having a gulp script for running and testing, plus supporting CoffeeScript and other customizations would be really cool too ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants