Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MobilenetV4: add two more lightweight models #2275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2024

Conversation

baorepo
Copy link
Contributor

@baorepo baorepo commented Sep 5, 2024

Mobilenetv4 is very fast and ideal for embedded devices. However, for many low-cost, low-power embedded MCU devices, smaller models are required. Hopefully this PR will merge.

Mobilenetv4 is very fast and ideal for embedded devices. However, for many low-cost, low-power embedded MCU devices, smaller models are required. Hopefully this PR will merge.
@rwightman
Copy link
Collaborator

@baorepo if I can get an okay result training one/both of these will merge...

FYI I added some REALLY small models recently for test purposes, but they're actually useable for fine-tune on smaller datasets, check out the first three rows of https://github.com/huggingface/pytorch-image-models/blob/main/results/benchmark-infer-amp-nchw-pt240-cu124-rtx4090.csv

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@baorepo
Copy link
Contributor Author

baorepo commented Sep 6, 2024

Thanks, I will also test the small model you mentioned in my scenario.

@rwightman rwightman merged commit a22ce0a into huggingface:main Sep 22, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants