Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nabarup add comments in HammingDiversityLogitsProcessor inside logit_process. Issue #24783 #25601

Closed

Conversation

Nabarup-Maity
Copy link

@Nabarup-Maity Nabarup-Maity commented Aug 18, 2023

What does this PR do?

add comments in functions inside logit process under model.generate.

@gante kindly check. This is my first ever contribution. Hope it will help.

Fixes # (issue)
#24783

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

Copy link
Author

@Nabarup-Maity Nabarup-Maity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fine

@gante
Copy link
Member

gante commented Aug 21, 2023

Hey @Nabarup-Maity -- This logits processor was already claimed (and being worked on) by another contributor, as it can be seen in the main issue. As such, I will not be accepting this PR :)

@gante gante closed this Sep 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants