-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Model names in HydPy 6.0 #99
Comments
I would say we have three types of application model names:
|
If find naming the |
I added evap_io to the table above. |
I still do not know if we will keep them as independent models or merge them into other Evap models, but I added preliminary names for |
Same for |
I nearly finished |
The main models can be sub-submodels idea seems to be a good one. Hence, we really need something like a |
|
A added |
I changed |
I removed |
I added |
I changed the name |
I added Adding them to the |
I added |
I added Consider this name as a very first suggestion. I tried to come up with a name that combines MORECS and LARSIM to clarify that there are some deviations from the original MORECS methodology that follow the LARSIM model. |
Our (successful!) extraction of the evapotranspiration calculations from |
I added the |
I added (preliminary versions) of dam_pump, dam_sluice, and dam_pump_sluice to the master branch and updated the above table. |
I added |
I added |
I added |
I added |
I added |
For meteo and evap models I propose the naming convention: new model names according to this convention: meteo_glob_fao56 instead of meteo_fao56glob evap_rep_io instead of evap_io |
I propose model name |
Yes, making the names of
|
I would interpret the name wland_wag as the HydPy model using wageningen equations for the walrus part |
…the HydPy-Evap model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Meteo model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-L(-Land) model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-ARMA model family as defined in issue #99.
I added |
I added |
I will use names like "HydPy-Dam-V1 (dam model, version 1)" for |
I changed |
… the HydPy-Dam model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Evap model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Meteo model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-L(-Land) model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-ARMA model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Conv model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Dummy model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Exch model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-H model family as defined in issue #99.
…model family as defined in issue #99.
… model family as defined in issue #99.
…the HydPy-Test model family as defined in issue #99.
…model family as defined in issue #99.
…m_v001` to `dam_v005` of the HydPy-Dam model family as defined in issue #99.
…branch_hbv96`, and add a documentation-style name, as defined in issue #99.
…odels `lstream_v001` and `lstream_v002` to `kinw_williams` and `kinw_williams_ext`, and introduce documentation-style names as defined in issue #99.
I implemented everything as discussed. I will open a separate issue regarding the further development of I kept the original variable names for We don't have separation into model groups and subgroups anymore! Now, every model family consists of exactly one base model, and all its application models are derived from it. So, we could rename "Model Collection" (a term I never liked too much) to "Model Families" to further increase the consistency of terms used in the documentation. |
In HydPy 5, model names are not overly consistent. We aim to improve this in HydPy 6.0. The following table lists the current and future names. The future names are still open for discussion. Hence, I will edit the table until we agree on all names. The discussion can take place as additional comments, as usual.
source code
source code
documentation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: