ci: use tools/ci.sh in Github Actions #497
Assignees
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
dependent
Developer_Experience
good-first-issue
Good for newcomers
Hacktoberfest
Hacktoberfest participants are welcome to take a stab at issues marked with this label.
Milestone
Comments
petermetz
added
bug
|
⏳ Alright! Looks like we need to wait for some dependencies: 💡 Don't worry, I will continue watching the list above and keep this comment updated. To add or remove a dependency please update this issue/PR description. Brought to you by Dependent Issues (:robot: ). Happy coding! |
petermetz
added a commit
to petermetz/cacti
that referenced
this issue
Mar 24, 2021
While we were getting to know the GitHub Actions CI runner we temporarily stopped using the tools/ci.sh script to run the tests, but now that we are properly familiarized with GHA and it's quirks, it is time to go back to the good old script we've been using before migrating over to GHA for CI. Fixes hyperledger-cacti#497 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
petermetz
added a commit
to petermetz/cacti
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2021
While we were getting to know the GitHub Actions CI runner we temporarily stopped using the tools/ci.sh script to run the tests, but now that we are properly familiarized with GHA and it's quirks, it is time to go back to the good old script we've been using before migrating over to GHA for CI. Fixes hyperledger-cacti#497 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
petermetz
added a commit
to petermetz/cacti
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2021
Primary change ============= While we were getting to know the GitHub Actions CI runner we temporarily stopped using the tools/ci.sh script to run the tests, but now that we are properly familiarized with GHA and it's quirks, it is time to go back to the good old script we've been using before migrating over to GHA for CI. Secondary change ================ Add retries to the tests to minimize the amount of failures due to flake where manual intervention is needed (e.g. manually restarting the tests after a false negative). This will also not make the false negatives go away 100% but the hope is that it will reduce them in numbers and therefore make it a little less annoying for contributors who send PRs. Fixes hyperledger-cacti#497 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
petermetz
added a commit
to petermetz/cacti
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2021
Primary change ============= While we were getting to know the GitHub Actions CI runner we temporarily stopped using the tools/ci.sh script to run the tests, but now that we are properly familiarized with GHA and it's quirks, it is time to go back to the good old script we've been using before migrating over to GHA for CI. Secondary change ================ Add retries to the tests to minimize the amount of failures due to flake where manual intervention is needed (e.g. manually restarting the tests after a false negative). This will also not make the false negatives go away 100% but the hope is that it will reduce them in numbers and therefore make it a little less annoying for contributors who send PRs. Fixes hyperledger-cacti#497 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
petermetz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2021
Primary change ============= While we were getting to know the GitHub Actions CI runner we temporarily stopped using the tools/ci.sh script to run the tests, but now that we are properly familiarized with GHA and it's quirks, it is time to go back to the good old script we've been using before migrating over to GHA for CI. Secondary change ================ Add retries to the tests to minimize the amount of failures due to flake where manual intervention is needed (e.g. manually restarting the tests after a false negative). This will also not make the false negatives go away 100% but the hope is that it will reduce them in numbers and therefore make it a little less annoying for contributors who send PRs. Fixes #497 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
jordigiam
pushed a commit
to kikoncuo/cactus
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2021
Primary change ============= While we were getting to know the GitHub Actions CI runner we temporarily stopped using the tools/ci.sh script to run the tests, but now that we are properly familiarized with GHA and it's quirks, it is time to go back to the good old script we've been using before migrating over to GHA for CI. Secondary change ================ Add retries to the tests to minimize the amount of failures due to flake where manual intervention is needed (e.g. manually restarting the tests after a false negative). This will also not make the false negatives go away 100% but the hope is that it will reduce them in numbers and therefore make it a little less annoying for contributors who send PRs. Fixes hyperledger-cacti#497 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Depends on #496
Describe the bug
Currently the Github Action only runs a subset of the complete CI, for example the front-end components are not being compiled.
To Reproduce
Read the ci.yml file's contents in the .github directory of the project.
Expected behavior
Github actions runs the full CI suite so we catch all errors.
Logs/Stack traces
N/AScreenshots
N/ACloud provider or hardware configuration:
N/AOperating system name, version, build:
N/AHyperledger Cactus release version or commit (git rev-parse --short HEAD):
mainHyperledger Cactus Plugins/Connectors Used
All of them.
Additional context
N/Acc: @sfuji822 @takeutak @hartm @jonathan-m-hamilton
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: