Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade nodemailer from 6.6.2 to 6.9.13 #1968

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Vishwas1
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade nodemailer from 6.6.2 to 6.9.13.

As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 27 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2024-03-20.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-NODEMAILER-6219989
586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Release notes
Package name: nodemailer
  • 6.9.13 - 2024-03-20

    6.9.13 (2024-03-20)

    Bug Fixes

    • tls: Ensure servername for SMTP (d66fdd3)
  • 6.9.12 - 2024-03-08

    6.9.12 (2024-03-08)

    Bug Fixes

    • message-generation: Escape single quote in address names (4ae5fad)
  • 6.9.11 - 2024-02-29

    6.9.11 (2024-02-29)

    Bug Fixes

    • headers: Ensure that Content-type is the bottom header (c7cf97e)
  • 6.9.10 - 2024-02-22

    6.9.10 (2024-02-22)

    Bug Fixes

    • data-uri: Do not use regular expressions for parsing data URI schemes (12e65e9)
    • data-uri: Moved all data-uri regexes to use the non-regex parseDataUri method (edd5dfe)
  • 6.9.9 - 2024-02-01

    6.9.9 (2024-02-01)

    Bug Fixes

    • security: Fix issues described in GHSA-9h6g-pr28-7cqp. Do not use eternal matching pattern if only a few occurences are expected (dd8f5e8)
    • tests: Use native node test runner, added code coverage support, removed grunt (#1604) (be45c1b)
  • 6.9.8 - 2023-12-30

    6.9.8 (2023-12-30)

    Bug Fixes

    • punycode: do not use native punycode module (b4d0e0c)
  • 6.9.7 - 2023-10-22

    6.9.7 (2023-10-22)

    Bug Fixes

    • customAuth: Do not require user and pass to be set for custom authentication schemes (fixes #1584) (41d482c)
  • 6.9.6 - 2023-10-09

    6.9.6 (2023-10-09)

    Bug Fixes

    • inline: Use 'inline' as the default Content Dispostion value for embedded images (db32c93)
    • tests: Removed Node v12 from test matrix as it is not compatible with the test framework anymore (7fe0a60)
  • 6.9.5 - 2023-09-06

    6.9.5 (2023-09-06)

    Bug Fixes

    • license: Updated license year (da4744e)
  • 6.9.4 - 2023-07-19

    v6.9.4

  • 6.9.3 - 2023-05-29
  • 6.9.2 - 2023-05-11
  • 6.9.1 - 2023-01-27
  • 6.9.0 - 2023-01-12
  • 6.8.0 - 2022-09-28
  • 6.7.8 - 2022-08-11
  • 6.7.7 - 2022-07-06
  • 6.7.6 - 2022-06-30
  • 6.7.5 - 2022-05-04
  • 6.7.4 - 2022-04-28
  • 6.7.3 - 2022-03-21
  • 6.7.2 - 2021-11-26
  • 6.7.1 - 2021-11-15
  • 6.7.0 - 2021-10-11
  • 6.6.5 - 2021-09-23
  • 6.6.4 - 2021-09-23
  • 6.6.3 - 2021-07-14
  • 6.6.2 - 2021-06-18
from nodemailer GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: nodemailer

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@Vishwas1 Vishwas1 self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants