-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feauture] Support string arguments to utcOffset
method
#1395
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we skip these three lines, and put everything to REGEX_OFFSET_HOURS_MINUTES_FORMAT regex?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure I understood you well.
Can you provide more info on the changes you would like regarding this code block?
Do you want the empty line removed and have the
offsetFromString
method just below theREGEX_OFFSET_HOURS_MINUTES_FORMAT
, with no blank space in between?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it seems REGEX_VALID_OFFSET_FORMAT and REGEX_OFFSET_HOURS_MINUTES_FORMAT is doing the same thing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @iamkun the two provided regexes have some slight differences, but serve different purposes.
REGEX_VALID_OFFSET_FORMAT
is used to test the provided string value format.If the method argument is not prefixed with
-
or+
symbol the method exists early withnull
value. That's the only purpose of this regex.REGEX_OFFSET_HOURS_MINUTES_FORMAT
is used to split the output of the first regex intosymbol, hours, minutes
variables. We need to split the string in order to provide the necessary calculations.This could've been perhaps achieved using the
String.prototype.slice
method instead, but would require multiple calls (3 calls to be precise in order to extract symbol, hours and minutes values) - regex might be faster in this case.We could merge these two together but the method logic should be updated to reflect this change. It would break SR principle (more of a personal preference) and might be more error prone.
I am able to provide the requested changes, just wanted to give you a brief overview of the design choices behind 2 regex pattern 🙂 .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that make sense, thanks