-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace custom Rollup setup with tsup #1268
Open
arturmuller
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
tsup
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f1c918e
Disable package-lock in examples directory
arturmuller a7f7cd1
Replace rollup with tsup
arturmuller c20c046
Allow release from any branch
arturmuller 951a0ed
2.0.3-0
arturmuller 92c181e
Add exports field to package.json
arturmuller 3da4581
2.0.3-1
arturmuller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
package-lock=false |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
import { defineConfig } from 'tsup' | ||
|
||
export default defineConfig({ | ||
entry: ['src/index.ts'], | ||
sourcemap: true, | ||
dts: true, | ||
format: ['cjs', 'esm', 'iife'], | ||
globalName: 'Superstruct', | ||
}) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed, this fix resolves the "Masquerading as ESM" issue that affected previous releases. This is demonstrated by the ATTW diagnostics results (before vs. after).
In the current JavaScript ecosystem, as long as
"type": "module"
is specified in package.json, there is no distinction between.js
vs..mjs
and.d.ts
vs..d.mts
files, so this should work without issue.That said, all else being equal, I wonder if preferring explicit file extensions (exclusively using
.mjs
,.d.mts
for ESM) would help future-proof the code against any potential breaking changes in the module system implementations of ECMAScript, Node.js, or TypeScript. Given the complicated, ongoing history of CJS/ESM-interop this doesn't seem like a remote possibility.I'm curious whether you see any advantage in using the ambiguous
.js
,.d.ts
extensions, or if you are indifferent between the two options?