Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update lolex to version 1.5.1 🚀 #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2016
Merged

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

lolex just published its new version 1.5.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency lolex
New version 1.5.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of lolex.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

  • Fix setInterval() behavior with string times
  • Incorporate test from PR #65
  • Fix issue #59: context object required 'process'
  • fixed a case where runAll was called and there are no timers (#70)
  • Correct the clear{Interval|Timeout|Immediate} error message when calling set* for a different type of timer.
  • Lots of minor changes to tooling and the build process

The new version differs by 29 commits .

  • 9e654b9 Add info on creating a GitHub release (#79)
  • 62e2941 Merge pull request #78 from fatso83/master
  • 3823eac 1.5.1
  • 7c25ae6 Prepare for 1.5.1 release
  • 6241578 Merge pull request #77 from fdnk/master
  • 195b5d3 Fix setInterval() behavior with string times
  • a0b27e0 Revert "get global object without potentially causing a ReferenceError"
  • 47b30ed get global object without potentially causing a ReferenceError
  • 6d48cf3 Merge pull request #75 from fatso83/introduce-eslint
  • 9e4c0a6 Update dependencies
  • 3e4a52b Remove irrelevant TODO
  • 42d49eb Disable linting on BitHound
  • b3937ac Only run linting once on Travis
  • e9fe5a8 Remove remaining JSHint comments and modifications
  • efc5722 Add line comments for ESLint

There are 29 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 28, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.381% when pulling 66654d7 on greenkeeper-lolex-1.5.1 into 7ac2917 on master.

@icebob icebob force-pushed the greenkeeper-lolex-1.5.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 60ce3b6 to c58765c Compare July 29, 2016 18:13
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 29, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.381% when pulling c58765c on greenkeeper-lolex-1.5.1 into 4f46582 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 29, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.381% when pulling c58765c on greenkeeper-lolex-1.5.1 into 4f46582 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.381% when pulling 2271f31 on greenkeeper-lolex-1.5.1 into de4a5d1 on master.

@icebob icebob merged commit bf7706b into master Aug 12, 2016
@icebob icebob deleted the greenkeeper-lolex-1.5.1 branch August 12, 2016 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants