Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #939 by adding .mjs to stock Node resolver #955

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2017
Merged

fix #939 by adding .mjs to stock Node resolver #955

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2017

Conversation

benmosher
Copy link
Member

I'm assuming this is not controversial but thought it'd be good to run it through CI and get feedback just in case.

@benmosher benmosher requested a review from ljharb October 19, 2017 10:58
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 19, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 94.726% when pulling 32133d5 on mjs into 275f1eb on master.

@benmosher
Copy link
Member Author

canceled the OSX builds until I'm able to rebase onto ci-cleanup

Copy link
Member

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

We should probably also add a pair of files for "default export only", and later when node figures out the plan there, we can add a "default + named" pair.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 20, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.032% when pulling 714b4c8 on mjs into 1e3f842 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.032% when pulling 714b4c8 on mjs into 1e3f842 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants