Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 18, 2020. It is now read-only.

[DEVOPS-779] simplify CI setup with buildkite hooks #3180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2018

Conversation

disassembler
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Linked issue

Type of change

  • 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 🛠 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🏭 Refactoring that does not change existing functionality but does improve things like code readability, structure etc
  • 🔨 New or improved tests for existing code
  • ⛑ git-flow chore (backport, hotfix, etc)

Developer checklist

  • I have read the style guide document, and my code follows the code style of this project.
  • If my code deals with exceptions, it follows the guidelines.
  • I have updated any documentation accordingly, if needed. Documentation changes can be reflected in opening a PR on cardanodocs.com, amending the inline Haddock comments, any relevant README file or one of the document listed in the docs directory.

Testing checklist

  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

QA Steps

Screenshots (if available)

@disassembler disassembler self-assigned this Jul 3, 2018
@disassembler disassembler force-pushed the devops-779-buildkite-hooks branch 11 times, most recently from 02a5f43 to 3414b70 Compare July 4, 2018 01:29
@disassembler disassembler requested review from deepfire, cleverca22 and rvl and removed request for erikd and iohk-devops July 4, 2018 01:39
Copy link
Contributor

@rvl rvl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah!

@disassembler disassembler merged commit 3e659eb into develop Jul 11, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants