[TSD-116] Bump report server on master

[ksaric]

Description

I'm just trying to add #3394 to develop.

Linked issue

Part of https://iohk.myjetbrains.com/youtrack/issue/TSD-116

Type of change

• 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• 🛠 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🏭 Refactoring that does not change existing functionality but does improve things like code readability, structure etc
• 🔨 New or improved tests for existing code
• ⛑ git-flow chore (backport, hotfix, etc)

Developer checklist

• I have read the style guide document, and my code follows the code style of this project.
• If my code deals with exceptions, it follows the guidelines.
• I have updated any documentation accordingly, if needed. Documentation changes can be reflected in opening a PR on cardanodocs.com, amending the inline Haddock comments, any relevant README file or one of the document listed in the docs directory.
• CHANGELOG entry has been added and is linked to the correct PR on GitHub.

Testing checklist

• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.

QA Steps

Screenshots (if available)

[deepfire]

The Nix bump part looks good -- incl. the hash.

[ksaric]

All tests pass locally, AppVeyor timeouts, and I have no clue what's the deal with those two scripts but it doesn't look related to the changes.

[deepfire]

Only Appveyor remains, and it either times out, or fails with:`

[62 of 68] Compiling Pos.Wallet.Web.Server.Handlers ( src\Pos\Wallet\Web\Server\Handlers.hs, .w\dist\5c8418a7\build\Pos\Wallet\Web\Server\Handlers.o )
    ghc.EXE: getMBlocks: VirtualAlloc MEM_COMMIT failed: The paging file is too small for this operation to complete.

[ksaric]

Thanks for fixing CI and merging, @deepfire 👍