Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DDW-528] Focus inline editing field on mouse up #1231

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 21, 2018

Conversation

DominikGuzei
Copy link
Member

@DominikGuzei DominikGuzei commented Dec 18, 2018

This PR improves the UX of inline editing input fields. The issue was that it only started editing mode onClick which led to inferior UX when for example selecting the wallet name and only releasing the mouse over the field. The logic was changed to use onMouseUp instead, so anytime you e.g: select the wallet name and relase the mouse over the inline editing field it starts editing mode.


Review Checklist:

Basics

  • PR is updated to the most recent version of target branch (and there are no conflicts)
  • PR has good description that summarizes all changes and shows some screenshots or animated GIFs of important UI changes
  • CHANGELOG entry has been added and is linked to the correct PR on GitHub
  • Automated tests: All acceptance tests are passing (yarn run test)
  • Manual tests (minimum tests should cover newly added feature/fix): App works correctly in development build (yarn run dev)
  • Manual tests (minimum tests should cover newly added feature/fix): App works correctly in production build (yarn run package / CI builds)
  • There are no flow errors or warnings (yarn run flow:test)
  • There are no lint errors or warnings (yarn run lint)
  • Text changes are proofread and approved (Jane Wild)
  • There are no missing translations (running yarn run manage:translations produces no changes)
  • UI changes look good in all themes (Alexander Rukin)
  • Storybook works and no stories are broken (yarn run storybook)
  • In case of dependency changes yarn.lock file is updated

Code Quality

  • Important parts of the code are properly documented and commented
  • Code is properly typed with flow
  • React components are split-up enough to avoid unnecessary re-rendering
  • Any code that only works in Electron is neatly separated from components

Testing

  • New feature / change is covered by acceptance tests
  • All existing acceptance tests are still up-to-date
  • New feature / change is covered by Daedalus Testing scenario
  • All existing Daedalus Testing scenarios are still up-to-date

After Review:

  • Merge PR
  • Delete source branch
  • Move ticket to done on the Youtrack board

@nikolaglumac nikolaglumac changed the title [DDW-528] focus inline editing field on mouse up [DDW-528] Focus inline editing field on mouse up Dec 20, 2018
@nikolaglumac nikolaglumac self-requested a review December 21, 2018 17:00
Copy link
Contributor

@nikolaglumac nikolaglumac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great fix @DominikGuzei 🎉

@nikolaglumac
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Dec 21, 2018

Merge conflict (retrying...)

@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Dec 21, 2018

Merge conflict

@nikolaglumac
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2018
1231: [DDW-528] Focus inline editing field on mouse up r=nikolaglumac a=DominikGuzei

This PR improves the UX of inline editing input fields. The issue was that it only started editing mode `onClick` which led to inferior UX when for example selecting the wallet name and only releasing the mouse over the field. The logic was changed to use `onMouseUp` instead, so anytime you e.g: select the wallet name and relase the mouse over the inline editing field it starts editing mode.

---

## Review Checklist:

### Basics

- [ ] PR is updated to the most recent version of target branch (and there are no conflicts)
- [ ] PR has good description that summarizes all changes and shows some screenshots or animated GIFs of important UI changes
- [ ] CHANGELOG entry has been added and is linked to the correct PR on GitHub
- [ ] Automated tests: All acceptance tests are passing (`yarn run test`)
- [ ] Manual tests (minimum tests should cover newly added feature/fix): App works correctly in *development* build (`yarn run dev`)
- [ ] Manual tests (minimum tests should cover newly added feature/fix): App works correctly in *production* build (`yarn run package` / CI builds)
- [ ] There are no *flow* errors or warnings (`yarn run flow:test`)
- [ ] There are no *lint* errors or warnings (`yarn run lint`)
- [ ] Text changes are proofread and approved (Jane Wild)
- [ ] There are no missing translations (running `yarn run manage:translations` produces no changes)
- [ ] UI changes look good in all themes (Alexander Rukin)
- [ ] Storybook works and no stories are broken (`yarn run storybook`)
- [ ] In case of dependency changes `yarn.lock` file is updated

### Code Quality
- [ ] Important parts of the code are properly documented and commented
- [ ] Code is properly typed with flow
- [ ] React components are split-up enough to avoid unnecessary re-rendering
- [ ] Any code that only works in Electron is neatly separated from components

### Testing
- [ ] New feature / change is covered by acceptance tests
- [ ] All existing acceptance tests are still up-to-date
- [ ] New feature / change is covered by Daedalus Testing scenario
- [ ] All existing Daedalus Testing scenarios are still up-to-date

### After Review:
- [ ] Merge PR
- [ ] Delete source branch
- [ ] Move ticket to `done` on the Youtrack board


Co-authored-by: Dominik Guzei <dominik.guzei@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Glumac <niglumac@gmail.com>
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot merged commit f71a49e into develop Dec 21, 2018
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the feature/ddw-528-wallet-rename-input-improvement branch December 21, 2018 19:23
@nikolaglumac nikolaglumac mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants