[SYCL] Rename DoubleGRF to LargeGRF #7284
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change renames double GRF to large GRF both for users and internally in the compiler. We're doing this because we got direct feedback from customer facing engineers that we should use the large GRF terminology, and it also makes the naming consistent with other compiler work we are doing.
For the user,
still works, it will just throw a deprecated warning and will be removed in a future release.
The new way is
There should be no ABI break because we still check the previous image property name in the program manager, so applications built with an old compiler work using the runtime from a new compiler. I confirmed this with manual testing.
I will update the system test here to test the new flag as well: https://github.com/intel/llvm-test-suite/blob/intel/SYCL/DeviceCodeSplit/double-grf.cpp
Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick nick.sarnie@intel.com