Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add searchengine attribute structure to replace elasticsearch #141

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

andytson-inviqa
Copy link
Contributor

So that opensearch can be used, with a switch searchengine.platform like how database.platform is used.

So that opensearch can be used, with a switch `searchengine.platform` like how `database.platform` is used.
@andytson-inviqa andytson-inviqa added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 14, 2023
@andytson-inviqa
Copy link
Contributor Author

the changing of ELASTICSEARCH_* environment variables downstream will be a downstream problem to solve

UPGRADE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Kieren Evans <kierenevans@users.noreply.github.com>
@andytson-inviqa andytson-inviqa marked this pull request as draft December 14, 2023 19:26
@andytson-inviqa
Copy link
Contributor Author

andytson-inviqa commented Dec 14, 2023

going to hold off on this till I've tested opensearch. Both seem to user/password by default now, and I'm thinking, as managed services are also, it might be best defaulting to using that.

@andytson-inviqa
Copy link
Contributor Author

actually I'll just adapt it as a separate PR if going that way

@andytson-inviqa andytson-inviqa marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2023 09:06
@andytson-inviqa andytson-inviqa merged commit 3bf0811 into 0.4.x Dec 15, 2023
1 check was pending
@andytson-inviqa andytson-inviqa deleted the feature/searchengine-config branch December 15, 2023 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants