Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add analytics #62

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2019
Merged

chore: add analytics #62

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2019

Conversation

olizilla
Copy link
Contributor

It'd be nice to know if folks are reading the docs, and if so, how far they get.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Oli Evans oli@tableflip.io

It'd be nice to know if folks are reading the docs, and if so, how far they get.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Oli Evans <oli@tableflip.io>
@hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't like user tracking and analytics. Honestly I wish we had an alternative to sending our user data to Google. Not even in the websites of a distributed privacy-aware technology can be browsed without putting the ad-blocker condom on... And we have no one assigned to making something useful out of this data at the moment. So I can live without this, but I'm flexible and I don't mind so much in the end.

That said, implentation is better using Hugo's provided template for this. See:

https://gohugo.io/templates/internal/

:)

@olizilla
Copy link
Contributor Author

I hear you. I am working on a self-hosted solution: ipfs/ipfs-webui#930

@mikeal is working on making good use of the data as part our effort to have better metrics for the IPFS project https://github.com/protocol/metrics/issues/1

To alivate the unplesant feeling in the meantime, I can wrap the script in a check for the users navigator.doNotTrack setting, so we don't fetch anything from google if it is set.

hat said, implentation is better using Hugo's provided template for this. See:

I'm aware of the internal template, but the template suggested by GA differs significantly. I'd like to manage it ourselves.

@hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator

afaik, google respects DNT (?). It's ok. Thanks man!

@hsanjuan hsanjuan merged commit 8295d90 into ipfs-cluster:master Feb 14, 2019
@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

IIRC, google ignores it completely.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants