This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2020. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
refactor: return peer ids as strings #581
refactor: return peer ids as strings #581
Changes from 3 commits
5e839ef
1760949
9147ee6
5dd360b
9a00b4f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not use
nodeB.peerId
here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not part of the API defined in
interface-js-ipfs-core
so we should really remove it fromipfsd-ctl
return values.This is my mind wandering from the task in hand though so I'm happy to change it if required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, so it shouldn't be used in the interface tests because we can't guarantee
ipfsd-ctl
spawned the node(s) in the test. 👍 Sounds like a good plan, I'm happy to leave this like it is. Do you want to open an issue here to track that task?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've opened https://github.com/ipfs/interface-js-ipfs-core/issues/582