ipfs object patch api clunky?

[jbenet]

i would expect either:

ipfs.object.patch(root, 'add-link', name, hash, cb)
ipfs.object.patch([root, 'add-link', name, hash], cb)

// but not (current)
ipfs.object.patch(root, ['add-link', name, hash], cb)

[dignifiedquire]

I think it should be the first one ipfs.object.patch(root, 'add-link', name, hash, cb)

[daviddias]

Let's get that core spec done, so that js-ipfs-api can follow it too :)

[daviddias]

@jbenet well, you know...a way to get it less clunky is.. ipfs/js-ipfs#110 :D

[daviddias]

Now, interface-ipfs-core and the Object API spec exists. The implementation on js-ipfs-api updated to conform with it.

It shouldn't be 'clunky' anymore. Closing this issue, feedback is welcome on the interface-ipfs-core repo, see the API here:

https://github.com/ipfs/interface-ipfs-core/tree/master/API/object