Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Shared Core API (standardise across js-ipfs and js-ipfs-api) #110

Closed
3 tasks done
daviddias opened this issue Apr 4, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Shared Core API (standardise across js-ipfs and js-ipfs-api) #110

daviddias opened this issue Apr 4, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue

Comments

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Apr 4, 2016

Once js-ipfs milestone 1 is reached, we will start seeing more applications that will use IPFS and perhaps even depend fully on it in order to work. It is very important that we standardise as most as possible the core-API, so that we save our users from countless upgrading hurdles.

This will also help us identify how IPFS should be used directly. While we are at it, we must update js-ipfs-api to expose the same interface, so that apps can exchange between a full node and one accessible through an http-api without a problem.

TODO list:

@daviddias daviddias added enhancement exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue labels Apr 4, 2016
@daviddias daviddias added this to the milestone 1 - js-ipfs on the browser milestone Apr 24, 2016
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

The work as started https://github.com/ipfs/interface-ipfs-core :D (really excited about it cause now we have tests!)

@daviddias daviddias removed this from the milestone 1 - js-ipfs on the browser milestone Jul 27, 2016
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

This work has solidified and continues to grow in https://github.com/ipfs/interface-ipfs-core

For notifications on API changes, see: ipfs-inactive/interface-js-ipfs-core#55

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant