Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

IDE standardization? #7

Open
NoraCodes opened this issue Oct 8, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

IDE standardization? #7

NoraCodes opened this issue Oct 8, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@NoraCodes
Copy link
Contributor

Should we include .idea/ for PyCharm? I use PyCharm extensively on my desktop dev machine, and I think it would make the process of onboarding new developers easier if we had a .idea/ project directory already set up with execution settings for tests, etc. already set up. Otherwise, we will end up with a lot of duplication of work.
@BrendanBenshoof
Copy link
Contributor

So long as IDE integration is optional to the build and testing process.
(We should always be able to do everything needed from the command line)

@bmcorser
Copy link
Contributor

bmcorser commented Oct 8, 2015

Agreed. No harm in offering a PyCharm config, though. Many people swear by
it ;)

On 8 October 2015 at 15:46, BrendanBenshoof notifications@github.com
wrote:

So long as IDE integration is optional to the build and testing process.
(We should always be able to do everything needed from the command line)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7 (comment).

@NoraCodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BrendanBenshoof Absolutely. I do all my development from CLI on my laptop, so I'll need that myself.

@JulienPalard
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure about your PyCharm thing, I don't know what the .idea contains. But just keep it optional, let everyone use the IDE / editor they want, I propose our only common standardisation point to be the PEP8, and it should be "enough" standard ?

@NoraCodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fair enough. .idea basically just contains configs for running tests from within the IDE, which is nice for those who don't like to have more than their IDE open. I personally would be OK with not including them, since as @BrendanBenshoof says, testing should always work without extra tools.

@JulienPalard
Copy link
Contributor

Still don't exactly know what is inside the .idea, but, if it helps those with a set of IDE without impairing others, I'm not 100% against it, so, same as @BrendanBenshoof here.

@mvanveen
Copy link
Contributor

I live in vi and I imagine many others do, but if the .idea isn't large let's go ahead and add it. Alternatively, we could keep an ipfs URI for it around :)

@NoraCodes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mvanveen That's a much better idea, actually. I'd be happy to go with that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@mvanveen @JulienPalard @bmcorser @BrendanBenshoof @NoraCodes